REVIEW QUESTIONS ON MISHNAYOS
Prepared by Rabbi Eliezer Chrysler
of Kollel Iyun Hadaf, Yerushalayim
Ask A Question
Previous Perek TERUMOS PEREK 7
(a) In what way does the payment of a Zar who eats Terumah be'Meizid differ from one who eats it be'Shogeg regarding ...
1. ... what he pays?
2. ... how he pays it?
(b) What third distinction does the Tana draw between the two, based on the fact that the Zar pays pure Chulin?
(c) Why must be'Meizid mean that there were witnesses but no warning?
(d) Then why is he not also Patur from paying now, seeing as he is Chayav Misa?
(a) Is a bas Kohen who marries a Yisrael permitted to eat Terumah?
(b) What must she do in the event that she eats Terumah be'Shogeg?
(c) What punishment does she receive if she commits adultery?
(a) According to the Chachamim, the same two Dinim will apply if she marries a man to whom she (as a bas Kohen) is forbidden. Who might that be?
(b) What does Rebbi Meir say?
(c) Why is she ...
1. ... obligated to pay the Chomesh?
2. ... subject to Chenek (and not Sereifah)?
(d) Then on what grounds do the Chachamim argue with Rebbi Meir? Why does ...
1. ... she pay the Chomesh?
2. ... she receive the death penalty of Sereifah (and not Chenek)?
(a) The Mishnah exempts a Zar who feeds his small children or his Avadim, Terumah be'Shogeg from paying the Chomesh. Why is that?
(b) Why are they not Chayav to pay?
(c) What does the Tana say about ...
1. ... a Zar who ate Terumas Chutz la'Aretz? Does this mean that Terumas Chutz (see Tiferes Yisrael) is Chulin?
2. ... less than a k'Zayis of Terumas Eretz Yisrael?
(d) What sort of payment must the Keren comprise? Does the Kohen have the right to be Mochel?
(a) Which principle determines when the payment must be Terumah, and when he pays Chulin?
(b) Which other Halachah is determined by the same principle?
(a) What does the Mishnah say about a case where a Sa'ah of Terumah fell into one of two boxes, one of Terumah and one of Chulin, and it is not known into which one it fell?
(b) What will the Din be if the second box was (not Terumah but) ...
1. ... Terumah Temei'ah or Meduma'as?
2. ... Tevel?
(c) Why the difference?
(a) If it is not known which box is Terumah, and which, Chulin, and the owner ate one of them, Rebbi Meir holds that the second box is subject to Terumah and to Chalah. What does Rebbi Yossi say?
(b) What is the basis of the Machlokes as to whether it is Patur from Chalah (Rebbi Yossi) or Chayav (Rebbi Meir)?
(c) Like whom is the Halachah?
(d) What if ...
1. ... somebody else eats the second box?
2. ... the owner subsequently eats the second box too?
(a) What does the Mishnah say about a case where one of the two boxes (in the previous Mishnah) falls into Chulin?
(b) According to Rebbi Meir, the second box is subject to Terumah and Chalah (like he said it was in the previous Mishnah). What does Rebbi Yossi say?
(c) What does the Tana say about a case where ...
1. ... the second box fell into another batch of Chulin?
2. ... both boxes fell into one batch of Chulin?
(a) What do Rebbi Meir and Rebbi Yossi respectively say, in a case where the owner re-sowed one of the boxes, with regard to the second box?
(b) And what will be the Din if somebody else sowed the second box?
(a) What will be the Din in a regular case where someone sows Terumah seeds be'Shogeg?
(b) Under which circumstances will the seeds be Asur (like the boxes were in the previous cases) should the owner re-sow both boxes?
(c) What is an example of 'Davar she'Ein Zar'o Kalah'?
Answers to questions